http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-04/republican-donor-simmons-seeks-rule-to-fill-texas-dump#p1
This
article published in Bloomberg Business Week discusses a nuclear waste dumpsite in West Texas that has already been
built, and is currently in the process of seeking government approval to be
filled. For this to happen the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must change some
federal rules for dumping such waste. This would be a multi-billion dollar
industry, and a certain proponent of the site is doing everything he can to
influence authorities through lobbying, donations, and other methods to make
that happen.
The article also discusses the man behind the dump, Harold Simmons, an
80-year-old native Texan hailing from the small northeastern town of Golden
whom made his Bloomberg estimated 6.5 billion dollar fortune through involvement
in a number of businesses and industries, many of which were not exactly
environmentally friendly. He was a former executive at NL industries, once
called national lead company, who conducted lead mining in America for well
over a century and were the leading source for lead in paint products like
Dutchboy, before they diversified into titanium dioxide based paints, atomic
bomb elements, ball bearing slides, solder, pipes. By the 1950’s National lead had mostly
stopped mining and instead imported its lead and bought ore from mines in the
Adirondacks, Quebec, Norway, Cuba, and Australia. The company also made
products used in castor oil, oil drills, airplanes, and rayon. In the 1970’s
many of their weapons plants were tested and proven to be contaminated areas,
including a national lead plant in Fernald Ohio that produced high-level
uranium. A decade later in the 1980’s, a subsidiary of national lead agreed to
a multi-billion dollar cleanup plan. The article
details the innumerable political donations and lobbying that Simmons has
handed out throughout the second half of this century to secure his industrial
business interests. Simmons’ has been in trouble before, by 1974 he had been
indicted and acquitted for both wire and mail fraud, and was targeted by a
lawsuit leveled against him by the United Auto Workers union for his handlings
of their pensions. More popularly he was involved in an unsuccessful attempt to
take over Lockheed to drain its pension fund, which was over financed by about
1.4 billion. He coined the banking approach
of “all debt and no equity” a philosophy of capital management wherein he
discovered, and I quote: "Small banks in Texas were casual about
getting the maximum use of their funds. . . banks were the most highly
leveraged thing I saw. They borrowed most of their money and really didn't need
much equity except for purposes of public confidence." Realizing that
banks could be bought largely with borrowed money and one could be used
collaterally to acquire he set out to "buy a bunch, because one bank could
be used to finance another. All debt and no equity." His financial
dealings are as shady as his industrial.
Unfortunately, we have this
waste and something must be done about it. There are federal dumping sites but Obama’s
Blue Ribbon Commission on Nuclear Policy has advised government officials that
a new dumping area for radioactive waste
(other than the Nevada Yucca Mountains site) is needed, and in 2010, a
leader from within Simmons’ Waste Control Specialist company invited public
officials on the commission to visit the west Texas site which they propose is
the ‘ideal’ geological space for long-term storage of such waste.
Former
Texas environmental official, Glenn Lewis, who resigned from his position out
of protest over Simmons’ powerful lobbying influence within the state, and
lamented that Simmons was likely to find a way to influence the federal avenues
of power to get approval to start filling the dump with radioactive waste: Whatever
federal switch has to be thrown to get uranium into the hole, believe me, it
will be thrown; that’s how Harold Simmons works.” Chuck
McDonald, a spokesman for Waste Control Specialists, said “there really is no
connection between Mr. Simmons’s personal political giving, which he has said
he is doing because he believes very strongly in pro-business and free
enterprise, and anything WCS is doing.”
The
article raised a question for me over what we can really do about nuclear waste,
and how much influence people like Harold Simmons and the industries they
represent have. Simmon’s is Opera Winfrey’s neighbor in Montecito California
and has made an appearance on her show, but certainly not to tout his
environmentally unfriendly role in industries, it was to talk the prized sweet
potato festival of his hometown. He does do a considerable amount of charity
but those contributions are shadowed by his political donations to the GOP,
while Obama has been in power Simmons has shown his willingness to reach across
the aisles with bipartisan support, however, the money does not come without an
agenda. We inevitably generate the waste
through our reliance on nuclear power, which begs the question of how we can
safely and responsibly dispose of it?
Although it does not contribute to the greenhouse gas emissions that so
many are more concerned with in this era of high climate change consciousness,
nuclear power and the waste it generates obviously hold many environmental
dangers and public health concerns of their own.
Karen Hadden, the director of the
Austin-based SEED Coalition, an environmental advocacy group that supports
clean air and water in Texas and opposes the site was quoted: “The money is so
huge, and the political pressure is so strong -- that’s what we’re dealing with
here…Harold Simmons wants it to be a nuclear mega-mall." This is admittedly a difficult issue because
it is hard to determine where nuclear waste can be safely and responsibly
stored, however, I imagine that Simmons’ site, which is not far from Andrews
County, Texas whose capital which has a population of around 15,000, could be
facing some environmental and health concerns as a result of this waste. How
can Justice be preserved for people and the environment when these industries
and billionaires behind them have so much influence?
I’ll admit, I don’t know much about the nuclear industry, but when I read something about “easing regulations” on it, I can’t help but get the feeling that’s a bad idea. Aren’t we all kicking ourselves now about all those easy regulations we had on industries in the past that led to global warming?
ReplyDeleteObviously, this issue – as well as all environmental issues, in a sense – is extremely political. Ultimately, this boils down to the regulation of business with regard to environmental protection. Quite frankly, it worries me that these business leaders could have so much control over the government to the point that businesses are really setting their own regulatory standards under the guise of a government. In my opinion, the last thing our country or any country needs is a government that is willing to do whatever the next person waving $16 million tells them to.
I think it’s ironic that the article itself mentions that many business leaders worry that if they don’t get this permission from the government, it would hearken to socialism and an overall loss of freedom. However, isn’t that what those with attitudes like Simmons do – use their money to protect their own freedom at the expense of the freedoms of others? Capitalism isn’t infallible, as we can see by some of the gross inequalities in the distribution of wealth. As rpmcgee said – I also wonder if any Carver Terraces and Hyde Parks are going to be affected by this dump site? I wonder how “free” from the consequences of low regulation standards a member of those communities would say they felt.
The fact that we need to build a nuclear waste dump in the process of nuclear energy use speaks of its unsustainability. In my opinion, even though nuclear energy does not contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, there are other sources of energy on this earth that are both plentiful and sustainable...with research. One that has been on the radar for many environmental scientists is geothermal energy, which would potentially use heat from the earth's core and movements to generate energy. Nonetheless, in the competition between sustainability and immediate comfort, immediate comfort often wins. Most people are not willing to reduce the amount of energy they use and wait for a more sustainable option to factor in. With that said, I feel that that is the only perfect solution.
ReplyDelete