http://texasvox.org/2011/06/29/air-pollution-an-environmental-justice-issue-for-hispanics/
This
Article addresses health risks facing many Hispanic communities in Texas whom
are disproportionately affected by poor air quality. The author lists two primary
sources of this pollution--diesel engines and coal-fired powered plants. Although the article is not published in a
mainstream media source, it does attempt to cumulatively assess the
environmental and health impacts of coal fired power plants and diesel engines
on Hispanic populations in Texas. Both the employment and housing situation in
Texas brings Hispanic populations into areas with poorer air quality than other
ethnic groups. Without coincidence the rates of asthmatic death for non-white
peoples in those communities--and across the country--is generally higher. A
community’s proximity to a coal-fired power plant obviously endangers their
health by polluting the air with carbon emission related particles, and the
post cites demographic statistics that include the following excerpted facts: “65 percent
of Hispanics live in areas where the air fails to meet federal
standards. According to the Clean Air Task Force, Hispanics take in
approximately one-and-one-half times the levels diesel exhaust of the average
American, resulting in anywhere between 2,000 to 5,000 premature deaths in the
Hispanic community annually. Additionally, Hispanics are 3 times as likely as
whites to die from asthma.” The post also mentions a statistic that 15% of
Hispanics live within 10 miles of a coal-fired power plant. There is much evidence
indicating the dangers of elevated mercury released into the atmosphere by
coal-fired power plants, and cites a report from the Sierra Club which “indicated
that mercury—emitted from coal-fired power plants—is present in high levels in
rivers and streams that Hispanics fish. Pregnant women are especially
susceptible to the harmful effects of eating contaminated fish because mercury
poisoning contributes to babies being born with learning disabilities,
developmental delays and cerebral palsy.” The post
has a link to A 2007 University
of Texas study that found children living within a 2 mile radius
of the Ship Channel in Houston had a 56% higher likelihood of developing
leukemia that other children and that area of the city is predominantly
Hispanic. Although the EPA sets air quality standards for these plants that
enforce limits on air pollution for contaminants like lead, ozone, particles,
carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, these standards are
skirted by local governments through local and state regulation regarding the
zoning and permit practices that fail to asses cumulative impact. The post
explains how when the companies behind these plants seek to renew or receive
permits, the environmental impact of any proposed ‘polluter’ is not assessed
properly: “when a polluter applies for an air quality permit, the state
environmental agency (the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality – TCEQ)
looks only at projected air emission levels from that specific plant.
There is no requirement that they look at the cumulative impacts on air quality
and efforts to address cumulative impacts failed to pass in the Texas
legislature this past session.” These laws must change and the Texas
Commission for Environmental quality obviously need to be reformed in their
analytical methodologies that should be designed to protect people, but are
obviously protecting profits and industry. This post speaks to the ways that
environmental problems intersect issues of race and ethnicity, and is submitted
in blog form anonymously. As the internet provides a medium for people of all
walks of life to engage with environmental justice issues and learn the
relevant ways that these problems are perpetuated, it provides a gleam of hope
that science can no longer mislead or minimize the cumulative toxic impacts on
communities. It provides citizens access to information on their communities
and hopefully with a voice that speak to and bring about changes.
These findings are astonishing, and appalling. The fact that Hispanics take in 1.5 times more diesel exhaust fumes is mind-blowing. This issue relates a great deal to that in Hyde Park in terms of racial discrimination fostered by residential segregation. Where this issue differs from Hyde Park, however, makes it an even more difficult environmental issue to face. As we saw, Hyde Park residents had an extremely difficult time gathering evidence to prove that their community was ridden with contaminants, even when they were visible to the human eye, which is not the case with air pollution. Pollutants in the atmosphere are much less tangible. This could potentially be a problem for Hispanic community if they decide to start an activist movement much like Hyde Park residents. Not only will it be much more difficult to demonstrate that pollution is present, but it will also be extremely difficult to place blame on any specific group, especially when it comes to diesel emissions.
ReplyDelete